A0005317-A0005396

Review Queue by Exception Pass

This pass keeps the tag system scalable: clean low-risk evidence is system-handled, while humans see only exceptions.

Open public checker Open QA Auto-checked evidence Smart Note Checker Profile resume view Practice tasks

Sample exception decisions

Clean low-risk Wi-Fi note

Human items: 3System handled: 5

Skill	System result	Human?	Reason / next action
reports wifi issues clearly Score 100/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
writes clear job notes Score 100/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
explains quick help clearly Score 100/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
understands basic cyber safety Score 100/100	ready for review needs_human_review	Review	The skill is safety, provider-readiness, Senior, Master, mentor, quality-review, privacy or other guarded work. The system prepared the evidence but did not allow automatic public use. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review evidence before any guarded, Senior or Master-level public claim.
follows safe boundaries Score 100/100	ready for review needs_human_review	Review	The skill is safety, provider-readiness, Senior, Master, mentor, quality-review, privacy or other guarded work. The system prepared the evidence but did not allow automatic public use. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review evidence before any guarded, Senior or Master-level public claim.
organises tasks clearly Score 100/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
follows up professionally Score 100/100	ready for review needs_human_review	Review	The system prepared the evidence but did not allow automatic public use. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review by exception: approve, reject, pause, or request more proof.
explains tech clearly Score 100/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.

Private information risk

Human items: 7System handled: 0

Skill	System result	Human?	Reason / next action
checks website pages Score 60/100	needs review needs_human_review	Review	Private information, risky promises, account details or unsafe wording were detected. Flags: private_password_or_login_secret The Smart Note Checker or auto-evidence layer already marked this item as needing review. The score is too low for automatic checking and needs more proof before a person should spend time on it. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review risk flags before this evidence supports a public tag.
reports software bugs clearly Score 60/100	needs review needs_human_review	Review	Private information, risky promises, account details or unsafe wording were detected. Flags: private_password_or_login_secret The Smart Note Checker or auto-evidence layer already marked this item as needing review. The score is too low for automatic checking and needs more proof before a person should spend time on it. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review risk flags before this evidence supports a public tag.
writes clear job notes Score 60/100	needs review needs_human_review	Review	Private information, risky promises, account details or unsafe wording were detected. Flags: private_password_or_login_secret The Smart Note Checker or auto-evidence layer already marked this item as needing review. The score is too low for automatic checking and needs more proof before a person should spend time on it. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review risk flags before this evidence supports a public tag.
understands basic cyber safety Score 60/100	needs review needs_human_review	Review	Private information, risky promises, account details or unsafe wording were detected. Flags: private_password_or_login_secret The skill is safety, provider-readiness, Senior, Master, mentor, quality-review, privacy or other guarded work. The Smart Note Checker or auto-evidence layer already marked this item as needing review. The score is too low for automatic checking and needs more proof before a person should spend time on it. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review risk flags before this evidence supports a public tag.
follows safe boundaries Score 60/100	needs review needs_human_review	Review	Private information, risky promises, account details or unsafe wording were detected. Flags: private_password_or_login_secret The skill is safety, provider-readiness, Senior, Master, mentor, quality-review, privacy or other guarded work. The Smart Note Checker or auto-evidence layer already marked this item as needing review. The score is too low for automatic checking and needs more proof before a person should spend time on it. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review risk flags before this evidence supports a public tag.
organises tasks clearly Score 60/100	needs review needs_human_review	Review	Private information, risky promises, account details or unsafe wording were detected. Flags: private_password_or_login_secret The Smart Note Checker or auto-evidence layer already marked this item as needing review. The score is too low for automatic checking and needs more proof before a person should spend time on it. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review risk flags before this evidence supports a public tag.
follows up professionally Score 60/100	needs review needs_human_review	Review	Private information, risky promises, account details or unsafe wording were detected. Flags: private_password_or_login_secret The Smart Note Checker or auto-evidence layer already marked this item as needing review. The score is too low for automatic checking and needs more proof before a person should spend time on it. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review risk flags before this evidence supports a public tag.

Software bug note

Human items: 2System handled: 6

Skill	System result	Human?	Reason / next action
checks website pages Score 85/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
reports software bugs clearly Score 85/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
writes clear job notes Score 85/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
reports device issues clearly Score 85/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
explains tech clearly Score 85/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
organises tasks clearly Score 85/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
follows up professionally Score 85/100	ready for review needs_human_review	Review	The system prepared the evidence but did not allow automatic public use. Review by exception: approve, reject, pause, or request more proof.
follows safe boundaries Score 85/100	ready for review needs_human_review	Review	The skill is safety, provider-readiness, Senior, Master, mentor, quality-review, privacy or other guarded work. The system prepared the evidence but did not allow automatic public use. Review evidence before any guarded, Senior or Master-level public claim.

Marketing note

Human items: 2System handled: 10

Skill	System result	Human?	Reason / next action
writes clear social posts Score 90/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
shares approved links responsibly Score 90/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
tracks campaign results Score 90/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
reports device issues clearly Score 90/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
writes clear job notes Score 90/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
explains tech clearly Score 90/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
reports wifi issues clearly Score 90/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
explains quick help clearly Score 90/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
checks website pages Score 90/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
reports software bugs clearly Score 90/100	auto checked system_handled	No	No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence. No human action. Keep as system-checked low-risk evidence.
understands basic cyber safety Score 90/100	ready for review needs_human_review	Review	The skill is safety, provider-readiness, Senior, Master, mentor, quality-review, privacy or other guarded work. The system prepared the evidence but did not allow automatic public use. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review evidence before any guarded, Senior or Master-level public claim.
follows safe boundaries Score 90/100	ready for review needs_human_review	Review	The skill is safety, provider-readiness, Senior, Master, mentor, quality-review, privacy or other guarded work. The system prepared the evidence but did not allow automatic public use. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Review evidence before any guarded, Senior or Master-level public claim.

Complaint context

Human items: 8System handled: 0

Skill	System result	Human?	Reason / next action
reports wifi issues clearly Score 100/100	auto checked needs_human_review	Review	Customer complaint, low rating, appeal or dispute should always go to a person. Review by exception: approve, reject, pause, or request more proof.
writes clear job notes Score 100/100	auto checked needs_human_review	Review	Customer complaint, low rating, appeal or dispute should always go to a person. Review by exception: approve, reject, pause, or request more proof.
explains quick help clearly Score 100/100	auto checked needs_human_review	Review	Customer complaint, low rating, appeal or dispute should always go to a person. Review by exception: approve, reject, pause, or request more proof.
understands basic cyber safety Score 100/100	ready for review needs_human_review	Review	The skill is safety, provider-readiness, Senior, Master, mentor, quality-review, privacy or other guarded work. The system prepared the evidence but did not allow automatic public use. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Customer complaint, low rating, appeal or dispute should always go to a person. Review evidence before any guarded, Senior or Master-level public claim.
follows safe boundaries Score 100/100	ready for review needs_human_review	Review	The skill is safety, provider-readiness, Senior, Master, mentor, quality-review, privacy or other guarded work. The system prepared the evidence but did not allow automatic public use. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Customer complaint, low rating, appeal or dispute should always go to a person. Review evidence before any guarded, Senior or Master-level public claim.
organises tasks clearly Score 100/100	auto checked needs_human_review	Review	Customer complaint, low rating, appeal or dispute should always go to a person. Review by exception: approve, reject, pause, or request more proof.
follows up professionally Score 100/100	ready for review needs_human_review	Review	The system prepared the evidence but did not allow automatic public use. The note appears to involve cyber safety, accounts, privacy, business systems, scam, data or escalation-sensitive support. Customer complaint, low rating, appeal or dispute should always go to a person. Review by exception: approve, reject, pause, or request more proof.
explains tech clearly Score 100/100	auto checked needs_human_review	Review	Customer complaint, low rating, appeal or dispute should always go to a person. Review by exception: approve, reject, pause, or request more proof.

Admin actions stay simple

Approve evidence only when the proof is clear enough.
Reject evidence when the note is unsafe, inaccurate or not enough proof.
Request more proof for weak notes instead of reviewing them deeply.
Pause public tags if later evidence becomes risky or disputed.